"Godfather of AI" Geoffrey Hinton: The 60 Minutes Interview
字号跟随播放
章节 · 点击跳转视频
0:01AI教父辛顿与人类的抉择▶ 正在看
1:26从模拟大脑失败到神经网络▶ 正在看
2:50机器人踢球演示机器学习原理▶ 正在看
2:50万亿连接为何胜过人脑▶ 正在看
4:14连设计者也不懂它如何运作▶ 正在看
5:20AI自写代码与操纵人类的风险▶ 正在看
5:20辛顿的家世与父亲的期待▶ 正在看
6:35Bard续写六字小说令人震惊▶ 正在看
7:48预测下一个词不等于没有智能▶ 正在看
9:04刷房间谜题证明GPT-4会推理▶ 正在看
10:23医疗制药的好处与假新闻杀人机器▶ 正在看
11:43呼吁监管、军用机器人禁令与转折点▶ 正在看
01AI教父辛顿与人类的抉择
0:01
whether you think artificial intelligence will save the world or end it you have Jeffrey Hinton to thank Hinton has been called The Godfather of AI a British computer scientist whose controversial ideas help make advanced artificial intelligence possible and so change the world Hinton believes that AI will do enormous good but tonight he has a warning he says that AI systems may be more intelligent than we know and there's a chance the machines could take over which made us ask the question the story will continue in a moment does Humanity know what it's doing no um I think we're moving into a period when for the first time ever we may have things more intelligent than us you believe they can understand yes you believe they are intelligent yes you believe these systems have experiences of their own and can make decisions based on those experiences in the same sense as people do yes are they conscious I think they probably don't have much self-awareness at present so in that sense I don't think they're
无论你认为人工智能会拯救世界还是毁灭世界,这都要归功于杰弗里·辛顿。辛顿被称为AI 教父。这位英国计算机科学家提出的争议性想法,帮助让先进的人工智能成为可能,进而改变了世界。辛顿相信 AI 将带来巨大的益处,但今晚他要发出一个警告。他说 AI 系统可能比我们所知道的更聪明,而且机器有可能会掌控一切。这让我们提出了一个问题——故事稍后继续——人类知道自己在做什么吗?不知道。我认为我们正在进入一个时期,人类有史以来第一次可能拥有比我们更聪明的东西。你认为它们能够理解?是的。你认为它们是有智能的?是的。你认为这些系统拥有自己的经验,并且能像人一样基于这些经验做出决定?是的。它们有意识吗?我认为它们目前可能还没有多少自我意识,所以从这个意义上说,我不认为它们有意识。它们将来会拥有自我意识和
便签笔记
02从模拟大脑失败到神经网络
1:26
conscious will they have self-awareness consciousness I oh yes I think they will in time and so human beings will be the second most intelligent beings on the planet yeah Jeffrey Hinton told us the artificial intelligence he set in motion was an accident born of a failure in the 1970s at the University of Edinburgh he dreamed of simulating a neural network on a computer simply as a tool for what he was really studying the human brain but back then almost no one thought software could mimic the brain his PhD advisor told him to drop it before it ruined his career Hinton says he failed to figure out the human mind but the long Pursuit led to an artificial version it took much much longer than I expected it took like 50 years before it worked well but in the end it did work well at what point did you you realize that you were right about neural networks and most everyone else was wrong I always thought I was right in 2019 Hinton and collaborators Yan laon on the left and yosua Beno won the touring award the Nobel Prize of
computing to understand how their work on artificial neural networks helped machines learn to learn let us take you to a a game look at that oh my goodness this is Google's AI lab in London which we first showed you this past April Jeffrey Hinton wasn't involved in this soccer project but these robots are a great example of machine learning the thing to understand is that the robots were not programmed to play soccer they were told to score they had to learn how on their own oh go in general here's how AI does it Henton and his collaborators created software in layers with each layer handling part of the problem that's the so-called neural network but this is the key when for example the robot scores a message is sent back down through all of the layers that says that pathway was right likewise when an answer is wrong that message goes down through the network so correct connections get stronger wrong connections get weaker and by trial and error the machine teaches itself you think these AI
计算机领域的诺贝尔奖。要理解他们在人工神经网络上的工作如何帮助机器学会学习,让我们带你去看一场比赛。看那个,我的天哪。这里是谷歌位于伦敦的 AI 实验室,我们今年四月首次带大家看过。杰弗里·辛顿并没有参与这个足球项目,但这些机器人是机器学习的绝佳例子。要理解的关键是,这些机器人并没有被编程去踢足球,它们只被告知要进球,必须自己学会怎么做。哦,进了!总体来说,AI 是这样做到的:辛顿和他的合作者设计的软件是分层的,每一层处理问题的一部分,这就是所谓的神经网络。但关键在于,比如说,当机器人进球时,一个信号会被回传到所有层,告诉它们那条路径是对的。同样地,当答案是错的时候,这个信号也会传回整个网络。于是正确的连接会变强,错误的连接会变弱,通过不断试错,机器就自学成才。你认为这些 AI 系统在学习方面比人脑更强吗?我认为可能是的,是的。而且
便签笔记
05连设计者也不懂它如何运作
4:14
systems are better at learning than the human mind I think they may be yes and at present they're quite a lot smaller so even the biggest chatbots only have about a trillion Connections in them the human brain has about 100 trillion and yet in the trillion Connections in a chatot it knows far more than you do in your 100 trillion connections which suggests it's got a much better way of getting knowledge into those connections a much better way of getting knowledge that isn't fully understood we have a very good idea of sort of roughly what it's doing but as soon as it gets really complicated we don't actually know what's going on anymore than we know what's going on in your brain what do you mean we don't know exactly how it works it was designed by people no it wasn't what we did was we designed the learning algorithm that's a bit like designing the principle of evolution but when this learning algorithm then interacts with data it produces complicated neural networks that are good at doing things but we don't really
understand exactly how they do those things what are the implications of these systems autonomously writing their own computer code and executing their own computer code that's a serious worry right so one of the ways in which these systems might Escape control is by writing their own computer code to modify themselves and that's something we need to seriously worry about what do you say to someone who might argue if the systems become benevolent just turn them off they will be able to manipulate people right and these will be very good at convincing people because they'll have learned from all the novels that were ever written all the books by makavelli all the political connives they'll know all that stuff they'll know how to do it knowhow of the human kind runs in Jeffrey hinton's family his ancestors include mathematician George buou who invented the basis of computing and George Everest who surveyed India and got that mountain named after him but as a boy Hinton himself could never
climb the peak of expectations raised by a domineering father every morning when I went to school he'd actually say to me as I walked down the driveway get in their pitching and maybe when you're twice as old as me you'll be half as good dad was an authority on Beatles he knew a lot more about beatles than he knew about people did you feel that as a child a bit yes when he died we went to his study at the University and the walls were lined with boxes of papers on different kinds of beetle and just near the door there was a slightly smaller box that simply said not insects and that's where he had all the things about the family today at 75 Hinton recently retired after what he calls 10 happy years at Google now he's professor ameritus at the University of Toronto and he happened to mention he has more academic citations than his father some of his research led to chatbots like Google's Bard which we met last spring confounding absolutely confounding we asked Bard to write a story from six
words for sale baby shoes never worn holy cow the shoes were a gift from my wife but we never had a baby Bard created a deeply human tale of a man whose wife could not conceive and a stranger who accepted the shoes to heal the pain after her miscarriage I am rarely speechless I don't know what to make of this chatbots are said to be language models that just predict the next most likely word based on probability you'll hear people saying things like they're just doing autocomplete they're just trying to predict the next word and they're just using statistics well it's true they're just trying to predict the next word but if you think about it to predict the next word you have to understand the sentences so the idea they just predicting the next word so they're not intelligent is crazy you have to be really intelligent to predict the next word really accurately to prove it Hinton showed us a test he devised for chat gp4 the chatbot from a company called open AI it was sort of reassuring to see
a turing Award winner mistype and blame the computer oh damn this thing we're going to go back and start again that's okay hinton's test was a riddle about house painting an answer would demand reasoning and planning this is what he typed into chat gp4 the rooms in my house are painted white or blue or yellow and yellow paint Fades to White within a year in 2 years time I'd like all the rooms to be white what should I do the answer began in one second gp4 advised the rooms painted in blue need to be repainted the rooms painted in yellow don't need to be repainted because they would Fade to White before the deadline and oh I didn't even think of that it warned if you paint the yellow rooms white there's a risk the color might be off when the yellow Fades besides it advised you'd be wasting resources painting rooms that were going to Fade to White anyway you believe that chat GPD 4 understands I believe it definitely understands yes and in 5 years time I think in 5 years time it may well be
able to reason better than us reasoning that he says is leading to ai's great risks and great benefits so an obvious area where there's huge benefits is Healthcare AI is already comparable with Radiologists at understanding what's going on in medical images it's going to be very good at designing drugs it already is designing drugs so that's an area where it's almost entirely going to do good I like that area the risks are what well the risks are having a whole class of people who are unemployed and not valued much because what they what they used to do is now done by machines other immediate risks he worries about include fake news unintended bias in employment and policing and autonomous Battlefield robots what is a path forward that ensures safety I don't know I I can't see a path that guarantees safety that we're entering a period of great uncertainty where we're dealing with things we've never dealt with before and normally the first time you deal with something totally novel you get it wrong and we can't afford to get
it wrong with these things can't afford to get it wrong why well because they might take over take over from Humanity yes that's a possibility why would they want I'm not saying it will happen if we could stop them ever wanting to that would be great but it's not clear we can stop stop them ever wanting to Jeffrey Hinton told us he has no regrets because of ai's potential for good but he says now is the moment to run experiments to understand AI for governments to impose regulations and for a world treaty to ban the use of military robots he reminded us of Robert Oppenheimer who after inventing the atomic bomb camp campaigned against the hydrogen bomb a man who changed the world and found the world Beyond his control it may be we look back and see this as a kind of Turning Point when Humanity had to make the decision about whether to develop these things further and what to do to protect themselves if they did um I don't know I think my main message is there's enormous uncertainty about what's going to happen