Dan Dreyfus: The Next AI Bottleneck is Copper · 苏菲拉底
字幕 字幕位置
--:--
点击播放,这里会跟随视频显示当前句的中英字幕。

Dan Dreyfus: The Next AI Bottleneck is Copper

节目发布 2026-06-09 · All-In Podcast
丹丹·德雷福斯 JJason Calacanis CChamath Palihapitiya / David Friedberg
EDITED TRANSCRIPT · 依据现场录音编译整理,可划线生成便签
丹·德雷福斯(Dan Dreyfus)是 Fortnight Capital 的投资人,做了二十五年大宗商品,专注于基础设施与关键矿产。这次对谈在一场现场活动上进行,他先用十分钟做了一段主旨发言,讲述美国二十年轻资本增长模式的终结,以及电网、铜、稀土和白银背后正在逼近的供应瓶颈,随后接受了主持人的追问。本文依据现场录音编译整理。

关键矿产开场

主持人:今天请到的是 Fortnight Capital 的丹·德雷福斯。丹有一句话我印象很深:以后衡量人类进步,就看我们消耗了多少电。他还说,半导体产业在他眼里其实是一家工业公司,或者说基础设施公司,本质上就是一座工厂。他的工作是先想清楚世界要往哪儿去,再想清楚要到那儿去我们缺什么。丹,请开始。

德雷福斯:接下来十分钟,我想跟大家讲讲关键矿产(critical minerals)、大宗商品,以及美国脆弱得惊人的基础设施。如果我们真想实现技术目标、制造业回流和再工业化目标,还有国家安全与军事目标,这套基础设施需要几万亿、几万亿美元的投资。不过,先说一点历史。

轻资本增长的二十年

德雷福斯:美国经济增长眼下正处在一个极为重要的拐点上,增长的样子将要变了。从二十一世纪初一直到几年前,美国经历了一场我认为称得上经济奇迹的时期:我们创造了那么多增长、那么多市值、那么多价值,却几乎不需要投入任何资本。想想那些几乎零资本就创立起来的公司。谷歌靠搜索引擎,Meta 靠社交媒体,花三百亿美元买下只有十二名员工的 WhatsApp,一点资本开支都没有。还有流媒体平台、外卖平台,还有苹果,一家轻资本公司,创造了几万亿美元市值。还有软件即服务(SaaS)。创造这一切价值,完全不需要资本。

外移中国,供应链变脆

德雷福斯:就在我们创造这些公司的同时,我们也在干另一件事:把自己的关键基础设施一件件拆掉,搬到中国去。等于在轻资本这条路上加倍下注。可后来这件事开始反噬我们了。先是新冠,然后是俄乌冲突,然后是关税,现在又有伊朗冲突。每次碰上这类地缘政治动荡,通胀都像火箭一样蹿上去,高得要用望远镜才看得见,而且再也没有降下来。原因就在于,我们任由供应链变得太脆弱、太单薄,一点韧性都没有。

现在我们站在这个拐点上:我们想把当年拆掉搬去中国的东西全部搬回来,我们想再工业化。同时我们还赶上了一场算力革命,它对基础设施的依赖程度,比前几代计算技术高出不知多少倍。这就在关键矿产和大宗商品上制造了一个极其猛烈的需求冲击,而供给端偏偏也在受冲击,因为我们太久没往这些东西上投过钱了。

多个资本周期同时爆发

德雷福斯:现在有太多资本周期在同时进行,我从业以来从没见过这么多周期撞在一起。先说航空航天周期。波音和空客未来十年有一万亿美元的订单积压。再把太空经济加进来,它要抢的正是波音和空客在采购的那些材料和产能。

再说电网。得克萨斯的 ERCOT 电网跟全美其他电网是不联网的,那边天气只要稍微冷一点,电网就瘫痪,人们在黑暗里挨冻。加州这边,天堂镇(Paradise)那条起火的输电线造成三百人死亡。你知道那条线路有一百零六年历史吗?这个国家有些电网设施已经用了一百多年。还是在加州,要是有一半人买了电动车,或者满街跑的都是无人出租车,大家下班后六点钟一起插上充电、打开空调,电网直接就会被打垮。砰,就没了,我们全都坐在黑暗里。所以说,电网连眼下的需求都勉强才能应付,我们还没开始谈人工智能将要带来的那场用电海啸呢。

发电也是一样。我们眼睁睁看着中国建起了比我们多好几倍的发电能力。这是一个万亿美元以上的资本周期,未来三十年,很可能每十年就要投一万亿。数据中心,现在是每年一万亿美元,每年,全是基础设施,全是大宗商品。然后是半导体晶圆厂。中央处理器(CPU)正在强势回归,CPU 的用量像火箭一样往上蹿。有人说要投七千五百亿美元,我敢打赌这个数字远远低估了,最后得用万亿来计。最后是国防。台湾局势成了烫手山芋,日本在提高国防预算,欧洲在提高,美国也在提高。所有这些终端市场有一个共同点:没有关键矿产,一个都转不起来。一个都不行。这些事没有一件能办成。

稀土断供,福特险停产

德雷福斯:问题来了。去年四月,中国宣布对美国切断一批关键材料的出口:钐、钆、铽、镝、镥、钪、钇、铒,还有银,直接切断。我们跟很多大型工业供应链关系很近,钐钴磁体一断供,我们就得知福特汽车公司离整条生产线停摆只剩几天,真的就是几天,整个福特。顺便说一句,麦道(McDonnell Douglas)也一样。

这件事让战争部和能源部的人陷入了恐慌。要给他们记一功的是,他们正在做一件非常激进、也非常重要的事。

三张纸:股权、许可、包销

德雷福斯:他们现在挨家挨户去找美国和加拿大的小型资源企业,敲开这些过去二十年被当作死了的公司的门,说:这里有三张纸。第一张是一张股权支票,我们要投资你的公司,让你把手里的资源变成一座矿。

公司说,太好了,真是没想到。可问题是,我的许可证等了二十年,没人愿意给我发。他们说,看看第二张纸,这就是你的许可证,现在就开工吧。然后他们拿出第三张纸,公司问,这是什么?他们说,这是一份包销协议(off-take agreement),照付不议(take or pay),带最低保底价,保证你的项目有很高的内部收益率。保底价以上的收益全归你,有了这个底价,你就可以出去融一大笔钱,把项目快速推起来。

中国对这些关键矿产的掌控是绝对的,绝对的。要赶上去至少得十年,很可能二十年,但总得有个起点。我们不能永远让中国骑在头上,我们每次做了他们不喜欢的事,他们就掐一把,说要切断你们的出口,切断关键矿产出口,让你们在黑暗里挨冻。所以这件事我要给现任政府记大功。我做大宗商品二十五年了,从没见过这种事。我管这叫「反向既视感」时刻:一种强烈的感觉,这一切以前从来没有发生过。

铜是金属之王

德雷福斯:再说铜,这是金属之王,我只举这一个例子。我们干什么都离不开铜。要搞清洁能源,每兆瓦太阳能用的铜是常规基荷联合循环燃气轮机(CCGT)的五倍,风电是七倍。数据中心,现在建一座一吉瓦的 AI 工厂,每吉瓦要用五万吨铜,而我们马上要以每年十五吉瓦的速度建这种东西,每年。五万吨乘以十五吉瓦,就是七十五万吨铜。你知道去年全球铜的供给增加了多少吗?只有五十万吨,而这还只是数据中心一项。

再说电动车。如果无人出租车遍地都是,一辆电动车耗的铜是传统内燃机车的五六倍。然后是军事。俄乌冲突里,我们用掉的炸药比整个二战还多,你知道吗?装这些炸药的炮弹,你猜是什么做的?有一种叫「铜斑蛇」(Copperhead),名字很巧妙,取自一种毒蛇。它们全是铜做的。你觉得我们会到战场上去回收那些铜吗?不会,那些铜没了。所以我们做的每一件事都需要这些金属。那么,铜从哪儿来?

十八年挖出万年铜产量

德雷福斯:从摩亨佐·达罗(Mohenjo-Daro)算起,人类有史以来一共开采了七亿吨铜。一万年,七亿吨。其中八成的铜,我们想要的话大概都能收回来。但办法是把这栋楼拆了,把电网扒了,把欧洲、日本、中国的楼房都拆了。那样铜是回来了,可我们这场会就得在帐篷里开了。

所以到底怎么弄?现在全球铜的年需求是三千万吨,其中大约四百万吨来自回收铜,剩下两千六百万吨靠开采。就算我们只是跟着 GDP 增长,把数据中心的增量忘掉,把绿色能源和太阳能的增量忘掉,就像以前那样跟着 GDP 走。请仔细听:这意味着未来十八年,我们需要七亿吨铜。未来十八年要用的铜,跟过去一万年挖出来的一样多。这意味着每年得有五座世界级的一线巨型矿山投产。你可以去问 Grok,去问 ChatGPT,从现在到这个十年结束,正在投产的一线矿山用一只手就数得过来,还有手指剩下。

我不知道他们打算怎么办,因为建一座铜矿要七到十二年。现有的铜矿正在衰老,智利那些大矿已经超过一百岁,品位在不断下降。这会是一个非常非常大的挑战,一个正在逼近的瓶颈。今天最热的是内存、高带宽内存(HBM)和闪存(NAND),价格垂直上涨,因为那是眼下的瓶颈。但如果你想看到拐角后面下一个瓶颈,我强烈建议你看铜。

于是我们就到了这一步:供给冲击撞上需求冲击。大宗商品周期通常持续十五年,涨幅以几倍计。我们才走了几年,这才刚刚开始。

美元贬值与硬资产

德雷福斯:我还想再说一件事。我们谈了需求冲击,谈了供给,但还没谈我们正在怎样摧毁美元的价值。新冠以来,我们把法定货币的价值摧毁得一干二净。今天美国政府债务是四十万亿美元,每年增长两万五千亿。在这之上,还有一百万亿美元的未来社会负债折现值,也就是联邦医疗保险、医疗补助、社会保障、养老金,这一块每年也增长两万五千亿。联邦债务每年多两万五千亿,社会负债每年多两万五千亿,而美国政府每年的税收只有五万五千亿。

那么下次衰退来的时候会怎样?税收下降,开支必须上升,我们就要印天量的美元。二十世纪七十年代我们也遇到过同样的问题,当时的解决办法就是让货币贬值,靠一点通胀,靠一点增长,美元损失了七成的购买力。在那种环境里,大宗商品、硬资产和基础设施能保住你的购买力。你们去查一查,七十年代表现最好的资产类别是什么?遥遥领先的那个。这是你们的家庭作业。

就讲到这里,谢谢大家,期待和各位交流。

铜价翻倍不是大事

主持人:我们的一位搭档在年度预测节目上就押了一个类别,说表现最好的资产会是铜。而且那还是在跟丹聊之前,这就更说明问题了。

德雷福斯:我认为铜价从现在的位置轻轻松松就能翻倍。我见过钼从一美元一磅涨到三十三美元一磅,翻一倍算不上什么。

日常用电就会短缺

主持人:退一步说。你在后台讲了一件很有意思的事:把我们现在做的所有事情加起来,也只够勉强跟上人类最基本的能源需求增长。请你把在后台说的那套论述再讲一遍。

德雷福斯:问题在这里。二战以后,我们就没再对电网做过升级、现代化和加固投资,就这么放着不管。过去两届、三届、四届政府都在梦游,没做任何事来加固这套基础设施。现在,哪怕我们只是想实现再工业化、制造业回流和电气化这几个目标。我说电气化,意思就是把楼里的老燃气锅炉换成热泵,现在每栋商业楼都在换;就是电动车渗透率上升;就是大家更多地使用电子设备。还没谈人工智能,根本还没谈人工智能,光这些就会出现电力缺口。

主持人:光是正常过日子就不够用。

德雷福斯:光是正常过日子就不够用。

主持人:那会怎样?停电、限电?

德雷福斯:停电,限电,然后电价上涨。

电价涨在输配与技工

德雷福斯:你在某一期节目里提过一个很好的观点,说公用事业公司在故意抬高每件事的成本,好向监管机构申报更大的资本基数,按这个基数赚取股本回报率。我觉得有一点特别被低估:通胀全是从那儿来的,来自公用事业公司的输电和配电环节。因为过去二十年的电价,哪怕算上刚经历的这波上涨,按实际价值算肯定是跌的,按名义价值算也没涨多少。所以当你说电价上涨的时候,

主持人:发电还是便宜的。

德雷福斯:但越来越贵。

主持人:不,发电不贵,把电送到人手里才贵。

德雷福斯:把电送到人手里才贵。因为劳动力,技工(craft labor)才是最大的瓶颈,遥遥领先。过去十几年,我们让孩子们都去干什么了?去当程序员。

主持人:去东北部的大学。

德雷福斯:对,这是个大错误。

主持人:我想问问在座的观众,你们家里装了太阳能,或者装了家用储能墙的,有多少?大概一半人。第二个问题,打算在一两年内装的,有多少?又是两成。很明显,这当然是一群比较富裕的观众,他们正在绕开电网。解决办法会不会就是家庭和企业的能源自给?企业不等政府了。也许电网会变成一种奇怪的老古董,解决方案是自下而上长出来的。

德雷福斯:工业用电无论如何都离不开电网,那是工业用电的根基。光是工业这一块要做的事,规模就大得惊人。给你一个数字。一座一吉瓦的 AI 工厂,如果全用太阳能供电,我是坚定看多太阳能的,但太阳能的容量因子只有两成,因为太阳不是一直在照。按两成容量因子算,一吉瓦数据中心需要五吉瓦的光伏,每吉瓦光伏占地七千英亩,五吉瓦就是三万五千英亩,比旧金山市还大。而且你到哪儿去找那么多工人?这才是我们最大的瓶颈,技工。

稀土不稀,难在提炼

主持人:通常来说,稀缺会催生创新。我见过一些创业公司在讲采矿新技术,主要是针对传统意义上的稀土。他们的说法是,我们需要的一切都在脚下的地里,只是我们只开采地表附近的东西。你觉得有没有一批即将上市的创新,最终能释放出比现在大得多的产能?毕竟我们把这些东西从地里弄出来,用的还是一百年前的技术。

德雷福斯:对某些大宗商品来说,有。你提到稀土。十四世纪以来有一群人叫炼金术士,他们说能把铅变成金子。那时候的元素周期表只有四种元素:水、火、气、土。火是什么,他们能搞明白;气挺纯的,水也纯。可每次在土里看到不认识的东西,他们就管它叫稀土。所以稀土到处都是,提取稀土的技术会让我们拥有极其充足的稀土。问题在于加工。这才是问题。把从地里挖出来的东西变成能用的东西,全套技术诀窍都在中国人手里。所以中间总会有一个加工转化的环节绕不过去。至于铜这样的东西,市场太大了,很难找到一种技术能一夜之间解决问题。

回流制造与蓝领高薪

主持人:再抛几个我们在播客上反复谈的话题。假如我们真的跟中国形成对抗,而他们是供应方,是供应链里最脆弱的那一环。那我们其实能解决就业被替代的问题,注意是替代,不是末日。美国想要工作的人,能拿到薪水极高的工作。我们可以把台湾的晶圆厂搬过来,这已经在做了。我们要把产业带回北美,据我一个做自动化采矿系统的朋友说,南美也会有份。我们能在这里创造大量工作岗位。我们老说美国落后了,可要是我们不买了,开始自己造了,中国会怎样?

德雷福斯:你说的这一点,对整个就业辩论非常重要。我们要建的这些东西,需要的技工数量几乎没有上限,而且真的没有别的路可走。看看两千年代发生了什么。我们把工厂全拆了搬去中国,谁被打垮了?是蓝领技工,由此引发了各种意想不到的后果:芬太尼、贫富差距。

主持人:宾夕法尼亚,底特律。

德雷福斯:两个海岸的人把钱都赚走了,国家的腹地,那些最本分的人,被打垮了。今天讽刺的地方在于,同样是中部那片地方,当年被抛弃的那些人,现在拿的是这样的起薪:你去 Quanta 大学,成绩排在班里前列,高中一毕业起薪就是十五万美元。更讽刺的是,他们干的活,恰恰可能正在替代一部分初级的白领工作。局面完全倒过来了。说到底这是个有效市场,工作岗位会流向钱在的地方,而现在钱正在涌进这个领域。

核电、天然气与白银

主持人:能不能再谈几个领域?你怎么看其他能源形式,天然气、煤炭、核电、碳氢燃料?从需求端看,最简单粗暴的结论似乎是什么都缺。但你是怎么区分的?比如你为什么说自己特别看多太阳能?你怎么看核电?这些不同的能源你是怎么权衡取舍的?

德雷福斯:这个国家的天然气多得能游泳,太阳能我们也能建,这些都不是瓶颈。核电,我们其实建不了,连安全壳容器都造不出来。韩国人能造,我们在这儿造不了。所以系统里永远会有这些大瓶颈。不管你说的是太阳能、天然气还是铀,原材料我们都会有,比如从地里钻出来的天然气,我们缺的是建核电站所需的关键矿产。比如我们会缺造光伏板的银,尤其是如果我们开始往太空发射数据中心,那要消耗惊人数量的银。

现在白银的供需状况是这样的:每年消费十二亿盎司,每年供给十亿盎司,也就是每年两亿盎司的缺口,而地面库存只剩六亿盎司了。钟在滴答响。各位,我们还剩三年,然后就断货了。到那时太阳能的故事就变成了,光伏电池用的银从哪儿来。

主持人:所以为了我们的孩子,也为了这个国家,「工具腰带一代」就是我们该做的配置:拿一些铜、白银和矿产的敞口,然后围绕这个领域还有一批服务商,是我们明年该去研究的。

德雷福斯:别忘了劳动力和服务商,那是很大的一块。

如何配置资本

主持人:你是怎么配置资本的?你在最前端持有矿山和生产环节,但也看终端应用。你怎么决定哪里不碰?因为这些看起来都是了不起的终端市场,但你也可能被碾过去。要是站错了位置,有供给冲击,有中国的供给操控,有低价倾销,一切看起来都显而易见,可你照样能亏一大笔钱。

德雷福斯:你必须真正理解供应链。我觉得对很多人来说,供应链是个古怪而神秘的概念。我还是觉得,很多美国城市居民至今认为火腿三明治是从冰箱里长出来的,从来不去想芝加哥郊外每个月宰杀的三千万头猪。

主持人:弗里德伯格开始激动了。

德雷福斯:第一,你得搞清楚供应链的卡点在哪里。第二,你得确保自己不会被技术颠覆,这也是弗里德伯格刚才那个问题的意思:会不会冒出某个东西,把供应链里的这种紧缺给替代掉了。

主持人:为丹鼓掌,讲得非常好,信息量非常大。

德雷福斯:谢谢。

本期讲者
丹·德雷福斯大宗商品与基础设施领域的对冲基金投资人,节目介绍其所属机构为 Fortnight Capital,自述从事大宗商品投资 25 年,曾经历钼、铜等金属的完整周期。
Jason CalacanisAll-In 播客联合主持人,天使投资人,Launch 基金创始人,本场负责引介嘉宾并推动问答。
Chamath Palihapitiya / David FriedbergAll-In 播客联合主持人。Chamath 是 Social Capital 创始人,曾在年度预测节目中把铜列为最佳资产;Friedberg 是农业科技公司 Ohalo 创始人,本场提出「稀缺催生创新」的追问。
章节 · 点击跳转视频
0:00 开场:脆弱基建需万亿投资 ▶ 正在看
0:55 零资本时代的经济奇迹 ▶ 正在看
1:47 供应链外迁的通胀反噬 ▶ 正在看
2:52 同时上演的多个资本周期 ▶ 正在看
5:37 中国断供与政府三张纸 ▶ 正在看
8:17 铜:需求与供给的算术 ▶ 正在看
12:04 美元贬值与硬资产保值 ▶ 正在看
13:50 电网老化与电价从何而来 ▶ 正在看
17:33 采矿创新与稀土加工瓶颈 ▶ 正在看
19:10 技术工人与就业格局逆转 ▶ 正在看
21:28 能源组合取舍与白银库存 ▶ 正在看
23:16 如何在供应链里配置资本 ▶ 正在看
本期论点
本期回应
17:29
电力基础设施扩张的最大瓶颈是技术工人短缺,而非技术或资本 卡在制度不在技术难题的出路在更强的技术吗?丹·德雷福斯
其他论点
0:03
衡量人类进步的真正尺度是人类消耗的电力总量 丹·德雷福斯
0:08
半导体产业本质上是工业与基础设施行业,而不是科技行业 丹·德雷福斯
0:55
2000年代初以来的美国经济增长几乎不需要资本投入 观察丹·德雷福斯
2:25
本轮通胀居高不下且不再回落,根源是供应链被削得过于脆弱单薄 丹·德雷福斯
4:27
美国电网仅能勉强满足当下需求,承受不住AI带来的电力需求 丹·德雷福斯
6:05
钐钴磁体一旦断供,福特整个公司距离全线停产只有几天 观察丹·德雷福斯
7:34
中国对所有关键矿产拥有绝对掌控力,美国追赶至少需要10到20年 丹·德雷福斯
10:47
未来18年人类需要的铜量,相当于过去一万年开采总量的总和 观察丹·德雷福斯
11:37
铜将取代存储芯片,成为AI基础设施的下一个瓶颈 丹·德雷福斯
13:40
铜价从当前水平翻倍是轻而易举的事 查马斯·帕里哈皮蒂亚
15:27
电价上涨的根源在公用事业的输配电环节,发电本身仍然便宜 查马斯·帕里哈皮蒂亚
18:36
稀土矿本身到处都是并不稀缺,真正的瓶颈在提取与加工环节 丹·德雷福斯
22:06
美国已丧失自主建造核电站的能力,连核电站安全壳都造不出来 观察丹·德雷福斯
22:43
白银年消耗12亿盎司而供应仅10亿,地面库存约三年内耗尽 观察丹·德雷福斯
01开场:脆弱基建需万亿投资
0:00
We've got Dan Dreifus on [music] the show. He's with Fornight Capital. >> We're going to be measuring human progress by how much electricity >> [music] >> we consume. >> The semiconductor industry, I view that as an industrial or infrastructure company. I mean, it's effectively a factory. We try to figure [music] out where the world is going and then we try to figure out [music] what we're going to need to get there. >> In the next 10 minutes, I am going to try to teach you about critical minerals, commodities, our incredibly fragile infrastructure here in the US that is going to require trillions and trillions of dollars of investment if we want to achieve our technological objectives, our reshoring reindustrialization objectives, and our national security and military objectives. But first, a little bit of history.
我们请到了 Dan Dreifus 来上节目。他是 Fortnight Capital 的。>> 我们会用消耗多少电力来衡量人类的进步。>> 半导体行业,我把它看作是一个工业或者基础设施行业。我的意思是,它本质上就是个工厂。我们试着搞清楚这个世界要往哪儿走,然后再搞清楚我们要到那儿去需要些什么。>> 接下来的 10 分钟里,我要试着给大家讲讲关键矿产、大宗商品,还有我们美国这套极其脆弱的基础设施——如果我们想实现自己的技术目标、制造业回流和再工业化目标,以及国家安全和军事目标,这套基础设施将需要数以万亿计的投资。不过先说一点历史背景。我们现在正处在一个非常关键的拐点上,关乎美国经济增长以及它未来的样貌。
便签引用
02零资本时代的经济奇迹
0:55
We are at a very significant inflection point right now in US economic growth and what it's going to look like. Really from the early 2000s until just a few years ago, the US went through effectively what I think was an economic miracle where we created so much growth, so much market cap, so much value without really having to invest any capital at all. I mean, think of all the companies that were created with no capital. You had Google with the search engine. You had Meta with social media. They bought WhatsApp for $30 with 12 employees. You know, no capital whatsoever. You had the streaming platforms. You had the food delivery platforms. You had Apple computer, which was capital light, created trillions of market cap. You had software as a service.
其实从 2000 年代初一直到几年前,美国经历了我认为堪称经济奇迹的一段时期:我们创造了那么多增长、那么多市值、那么多价值,却几乎不需要投入任何资本。想想那些在零资本基础上诞生的公司。谷歌做搜索引擎。Meta 做社交媒体。他们花 300 亿美元收购了只有 12 名员工的 WhatsApp。基本上没有任何资本投入。还有流媒体平台。还有外卖平台。还有苹果电脑,也是轻资产的,创造了数万亿市值。还有软件即服务(SaaS)。创造这一切价值完全不需要资本。而在我们打造这些公司的同时,
便签引用
03供应链外迁的通胀反噬
1:47
Absolutely no capital required to create all that value. And at the same time, we were creating these companies. At the same time we were doing that, we were literally tearing down all of our critical infrastructure and moving it overseas to China. So, we were really doubling down on that capital light mentality. But then it started started to come back to bite us, right? We had COVID, we had the Russia-Ukraine conflict, we had the tariffs, now we have the Iranian conflict, and every time we had one of these geopolitical flare-ups, inflation spikes like a rocket. You need a telescope to see how high inflation went, and it never came down. And the reason for that is we let our supply chains get way too fragile and way too weak, and there's no resiliency in the supply chains. And now we're at this inflection point where we want to reshore everything that we tore down and moved to China, we want to reindustrialize.
与此同时,我们实际上是在拆掉自己所有的关键基础设施,把它们搬到海外的中国去。所以我们其实是在这种轻资产思维上加倍下注。但后来这事开始反噬我们了,对吧?我们经历了新冠,经历了俄乌冲突,经历了关税,现在又有伊朗冲突,而每次出现这类地缘政治风波,通胀就像火箭一样窜上去。通胀高到你得拿望远镜才看得见,而且再也没降下来。原因就在于我们让自己的供应链变得太脆弱、太单薄,供应链里毫无韧性可言。现在我们到了这个拐点:我们想把当初拆掉搬去中国的东西全都迁回来,我们想重新工业化。我们还赶上了这场技术算力革命,它对基础设施的依赖程度远远超过上几代的算力
便签引用
04同时上演的多个资本周期
2:52
We have this technological compute revolution that is infinitely more infrastructure-intensive than compute was in the last generations, and this is creating this really wild demand shock for infrastructural critical minerals, commodities, at the same time where there's a supply shock because we just haven't invested in this stuff for so long. Now, there are so many capital cycles going on at the same time. I've never seen this many going on at the same time in my career. We have the aerospace cycle.
需求,这就造成了对基础设施类关键矿产和大宗商品极其疯狂的需求冲击,与此同时又存在供给冲击,因为我们已经太久没在这些东西上投过钱了。大宗商品,同时又遇上供给冲击,因为我们已经太久没在这些领域投资了现在有这么多资本周期在同时上演。我从没见过同时有这么多周期在而现在,同时有这么多资本周期在运转。我从没见过这么多周期同时发生我的职业生涯。我们有航空航天周期。
便签引用
3:30
Boeing and Airbus have a trillion dollars of backlog over the next 10 years. Now throw in the space economy, which is going to compete for the exact same materials and backlog that Boeing and Airbus are trying to source. We have the grid, right? Anytime it gets a little bit cold in Texas, the ERCOT, the Texas grid's not connected not connected to the rest of the US grid. Every time it gets a little bit cold, that grid shuts down and they're freezing in the dark. Then we've got, you know, here in California, Paradise, California, that power line that caught on fire and killed 300 people.
波音和空客未来10年有一万亿美元的订单积压。现在再加上太空经济,它将和波音、空客争抢完全相同的材料和产能。我们还有电网,对吧?德州只要一冷下来,ERCOT,德州电网没有和美国其他地区的电网连在一起。每次天一冷,电网就崩了,人们在黑暗中挨冻。然后我们还有,你知道,加州这边,加州天堂镇,那条起火的输电线路害死了300人。
便签引用
4:07
Did you know that that power line was over 106 years old? There's parts of the grid in this country that are over 106 years old. And then here in California, if half the people buy electric cars or there's robo taxis and we all go and plug them in at 6:00 p.m. after work and turn up the air conditioning, we're just going to kill the grid. Boom. We're going to kill it. We're all going to be sitting in the dark. So, the grid barely works for what we need it for right now, and we haven't even started talking about the tsunami of demand, electricity demand that AI is going to bring. And there's power generation, you know, we've let China go and build multiples more power generation than what we have here. And this is a trillion-dollar plus capital cycle that's probably going to be a trillion dollars every 10 years for the next 30 years. Data centers, this is now a trillion dollars per year.
你知道那条输电线已经用了106年以上吗?这个国家有些电网部件已经超过106年了。还有在加州这边,如果一半人买了电动车,或者到处都是Robotaxi,我们都在下午6点下班后插上充电、再把空调开大,我们就会直接把电网搞垮。砰。我们会把它搞垮。我们都得坐在黑暗里。所以电网现在勉强能满足我们当下的需求,而我们甚至还没开始谈那股海啸般的需求,也就是AI将带来的电力需求。还有发电,你知道,我们眼看着中国建起了比我们这边多好几倍的发电能力。这是一个万亿美元以上的资本周期,而且很可能未来30年里每10年就要花一万亿美元。数据中心,这个现在是每年一万亿美元。
便签引用
4:56
Per year, all infrastructure, all all commodities. Then there's semi fabs. Um the CPU is making a huge resurgence. CPU intensity is is going up like a rocket. And and I I bet you this number is way too low, $750 billion. I bet you that's going to be measured in the trillions. And then there's defense. Right? Everybody, you know, Taiwan's turned into a porky pie. Japan's raising their defense budgets. Europe's raising their defense budgets. The US raising their defense budgets. What the similarity is amongst all of these end markets is none of them will work without critical minerals.
每年,全是基础设施,全是大宗商品。然后是半导体晶圆厂。嗯,CPU正在强势复苏。CPU使用强度像火箭一样往上蹿。而且我敢打赌这个数字远远低估了,7500亿美元。我敢打赌这最后要以万亿计。然后还有国防。对吧?大家都知道,台湾问题已经变得很棘手。日本在提高国防预算,欧洲在提高国防预算,美国也在提高国防预算。所有这些终端市场的共同点是,没有关键矿产,它们一个都运转不起来。
便签引用
05中国断供与政府三张纸
5:37
None of it. None of this can happen. And so here's the problem. Last April, China announced that they were going to cut off exports of some critical materials to the US. Samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, yttrium, erbium, silver. Just cut it off. And we're close to a lot of big industrial supply chains. And the cut off of samarium cobalt magnets, we learned that the Ford Motor Company was within days, literally days, of their entire production line shutting down. The whole Ford Motor Company.
一个都不行。这一切都无从谈起。所以问题就在这儿。去年四月,中国宣布要对美国切断一些关键材料的出口。钐、钆、铽、镝、镥、钪、钇、铒、银。说断就断。而我们和很多大型工业供应链关系密切。钐钴磁体被断供后,我们才知道福特汽车公司距离整条生产线停产只差几天,字面意义上的几天。整个福特汽车公司。
便签引用
6:17
And same with McDonnell Douglas, too, by the way. And this put people in Department of War, Department of Energy into a panic. And to their credit, they're doing something really aggressive and really important. They are now going around to small resource owners across the US and into Canada, and they're knocking on the doors of these companies that were left for dead in the last 20 years. And they're saying, "Here is three pieces of paper. The first piece of paper is an equity check that we're investing into your company so that you can go and start converting your resource into a mine."
顺便说一句,麦道也是一样。这让战争部、能源部的人陷入了恐慌。值得肯定的是,他们正在做一些非常积极、非常重要的事。他们现在正在跑遍美国和加拿大的小型资源持有方,去敲那些过去20年被视为「已经没戏了」的公司的门。他们说:「这里有三张纸。」第一张纸是一张股权支票,我们投资到你的公司里,让你可以去着手把你的资源变成一座矿山。
便签引用
6:58
And then the company says, "Oh, that's great. Wow, that's that's that's a shock. But, you know, the problem is I've been waiting on my permit for the last 20 years. Nobody wants to give me a permit." And they say, "Oh, look at the second piece of paper. There's your permit. Go and start building right now." And then they show them a third piece of paper. And then the company says, "What's this?" And they say, "This is an off-take agreement, take or pay with a minimum floor price that's going to guarantee you a very high internal rate of return on your project, where you can keep all the upside above the minimum price, but here's a minimum price that you can go out and raise a bunch of capital to get this thing fast-tracked and up and running." Now, China has an absolute grip. It's absolute on all of these critical minerals.
然后公司说:「哦,那太好了。哇,这真是、真是让人意外。但是问题是,我的许可证已经等了20年了。没人愿意给我发许可证。」他们说:「哦,看看第二张纸。你的许可证在这儿。现在就去开工建设吧。」然后他们拿出第三张纸。公司就问:「这是什么?」他们说:「这是一份包销协议,照付不议,还有一个最低保底价,能保证你的项目获得非常高的内部收益率,高于最低价的上涨部分你全都留着,但这里有个保底价,你可以拿着它出去募一大笔资本,把这个项目快速推进、投产运行。」如今,中国在所有这些关键矿产上有绝对的掌控力。绝对的。
便签引用
7:41
And it's going to take at least 10 years, probably 20 to catch up, but we got to start somewhere because we just can't have China leading over us and squeezing our testicles every time that we don't do something that they don't like and say we're going to cut off your exports, we're going to cut off exports of critical minerals and you guys are going to freeze in the dark. So, I give a lot of credit to the administration for doing this and really, you know, I've done commodities now for 25 years and I've never seen something like this happen before. It's truly what I call a déjà vu day moment, which is the overwhelming feeling that none of this has ever happened before.
追赶上来至少要10年,可能要20年,但我们总得有个开始,因为我们不能一直让中国骑在我们头上,每次我们不照他们的意思做,他们就捏住我们的命根子,说要切断你们的出口,要切断关键矿产的出口,让你们在黑暗里挨冻。所以这件事我要给本届政府很多肯定,说真的,我做大宗商品到现在25年了,从没见过这样的事情发生。这真的是我所说的「似曾未见」时刻——一种压倒性的感觉:这一切从来没发生过。
便签引用
06铜:需求与供给的算术
8:17
So, here's copper. This is the king of metals. This is just one example. We need copper for everything. You know, if we want clean energy, you know, solar power per megawatt takes five amounts five times the amount of copper than a typical base load CCGT gas-fired turbine. Same with wind, seven times the copper. Data centers for a 1 gigawatt AI factory now, you need 50,000 tons of copper per gigawatt. And we're going to start building 15 gigawatts of these things per year. Per year. So, 50,000 tons per gigawatt at 15 gigawatts is 750,000 tons of copper that we're going to need for these things. Do you know what the copper supply was last year?
那么,来看铜。这是金属之王。这只是一个例子。我们干什么都需要铜。你知道,如果我们想要清洁能源,每兆瓦太阳能所需的铜是典型基荷CCGT燃气轮机的五倍。风电也一样,七倍的铜。数据中心,现在一个1吉瓦的AI工厂,每吉瓦需要5万吨铜。而我们将开始每年建15吉瓦这样的东西。每年。所以每吉瓦5万吨,15吉瓦就是75万吨铜,这是我们为这些东西需要的量。你知道去年铜的供应是多少吗?
便签引用
8:54
It grew only 500,000 tons and this is just the data centers. Then electric cars, you know, if we're going to have robo taxis everywhere, electric car consumes five or six times the copper than a traditional internal combustion engine. And then there's the military. In the Ukraine-Russia conflict, did you know that we used more explosives than in all of World War II? Do you know that? And the artillery shells of these explosives, guess what they're made of? One of them's called the copperhead, very cleverly named after a poisonous snake. They're all made of copper. Do you think we go into the battlefield and recycle that copper? No, that copper's gone. So, we need this these metals for everything that we do. Now, where are we going to get it? Going back in human history to Mohenjo-Daro, we have mined 700 million tons of copper.
只增长了50万吨,而这还只是数据中心。然后是电动车,你知道,如果我们到处都是Robotaxi,一辆电动车的铜消耗量是传统内燃机车的五到六倍。然后还有军方。在俄乌冲突中,你知道我们用掉的炸药比整个二战还多吗?你知道吗?而装这些炸药的炮弹,猜猜是用什么做的?其中一种叫「铜斑蛇」,很巧妙地以一种毒蛇命名。它们全都是铜做的。你觉得我们会跑到战场上去回收那些铜吗?不会,那些铜就没了。所以我们做的每一件事都需要这些金属。那么,我们从哪儿弄呢?回溯人类历史,一直到摩亨佐达罗,我们一共开采了7亿吨铜。
便签引用
9:48
700 million tons of copper over the past 10,000 years. Now, 80% of that copper, we could probably get it all back if we wanted. But, what we'd have to do is we'd have to tear down this building. We'd have to rip up the grid. We'd have to tear down the buildings in Europe, in Japan, in China. And we could get all that copper back. Sure. But, then we'd be doing this conference in a tent. So, how are we going to get it? Well, right now copper demand is 30 million tons per year. About 4 million of that supply comes from recycled copper copper. The rest of it is 26 million tons is mined.
过去1万年里,7亿吨铜。其中80%的铜,如果我们想要,大概都能拿回来。但我们得做的是,把这栋楼拆了。我们得把电网扒掉。我们得拆掉欧洲、日本、中国的建筑。然后我们就能把那些铜全弄回来。当然可以。但那样的话,我们这个会议就得在帐篷里开了。所以,我们要从哪儿弄?目前铜的需求是每年3000万吨。其中大约400万吨来自回收铜,剩下的2600万吨是开采出来的。
便签引用
10:28
And if we just grow in line with GDP, so forgetting about data center upside, forgetting about green energy solar upside, just growing at GDP like we used to. Now, listen carefully. That means over the next 18 years, we're going to need 700 million tons of copper. Over the next 18 years, we're going to need as much copper as we mined in the last 10,000 years. That means we're going to need five world-class mega tier one mines coming online every single year. And you can go and grok this or chat GPT this. You can count on one hand and have some fingers left over uh the number of tier one mines that are coming on between now and the end of the decade. So, I don't know what they're going to do because it takes 7 to 12 years to build a copper mine. The existing copper mines are dying. You know, the big mines in Chile are over 100 years old. The grades are depleting.
如果我们只按GDP的增速增长,也就是不考虑数据中心带来的额外需求,不考虑绿色能源、太阳能带来的额外需求,就按以前那样随GDP增长。现在,仔细听好。这意味着未来18年,我们将需要7亿吨铜。未来18年里,我们需要的铜量相当于过去1万年开采的总量。这意味着我们每一年都需要有五座世界级的超大型一级矿山投产。你可以去用Grok或者ChatGPT查一下。从现在到本个十年结束,即将投产的一级矿山数量,你一只手都数不完,还能剩下几根手指。所以我不知道他们打算怎么办,因为建一座铜矿要7到12年。现有的铜矿正在枯竭。你知道,智利那些大矿已经超过100年了,品位在下降。
便签引用
11:24
And um this is going to be a major major challenge and an upcoming bottleneck. Right? Today, all the rage is in memory and HBM and NAND. Prices are going vertical cuz that's the bottleneck. Now, if you want to look around the corner and see the next bottleneck coming, I strongly urge you to look at copper. And so, um here we are. A supply shock meets a demand shock. Commodity cycles typically last 15 years and have multiple hundreds percent of upside. We're only a few years into this. This is just really getting started. And I want to say one more thing. Right, we spoke about demand.
而且,这将是一个非常非常大的挑战,也是即将到来的瓶颈。对吧?今天大家追捧的都是存储、HBM和NAND。价格直线上涨,因为那是瓶颈。那么,如果你想看看拐角后面、看看下一个瓶颈是什么,我强烈建议你看看铜。所以,嗯,就是这样。供给冲击撞上需求冲击。大宗商品周期通常持续15年,并且有数百个百分点的上涨空间。我们才刚进入几年。这真的才刚刚开始。我还想再说一件事。对,我们谈了需求,
便签引用
07美元贬值与硬资产保值
12:04
We're having this demand shock. We spoke about supply. But, what we haven't spoken about is how we're destroying the value of the US dollar. Since COVID, we have absolutely destroyed the value of our fiat currencies. Today, we have $40 trillion of government debt that's growing at $2.5 trillion every year. On top of that, we have $100 trillion of discounted present value of the future social liabilities. So, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, pensions. That's also growing by $2.5 trillion a year. So, you have $2.5 trillion of growth on the federal debt, $2.5 trillion of growth on the social liabilities.
我们正在经历这场需求冲击。我们谈了供给。但我们还没谈的是,我们正在如何摧毁美元的价值。自新冠以来,我们彻底摧毁了法定货币的价值。今天我们有40万亿美元的政府债务,而且每年还在以2.5万亿美元的速度增长。在这之上,我们还有100万亿美元的未来社会福利负债现值。也就是联邦医保、医疗补助、社保、养老金。这部分每年也在以2.5万亿美元增长。所以,联邦债务每年增长2.5万亿,社会福利负债每年增长2.5万亿。负债。
便签引用
12:42
The US government only has $5.5 trillion of tax receipts every year. And so, what's going to happen the next time we have a recession where tax receipts go down and spending has to go up? We're going to print giga dollars. And in the 1970s, we had this problem as well. And the way we did it is we just debased the currency through through some inflation, through some growth, and the currency lost 70% of its purchasing power. And commodities and hard assets and infrastructure will protect your purchasing power in that kind of environment. Go and look it up. In the 1970s, what was the best performing asset class by a mile?
而美国政府每年的税收收入只有5.5万亿美元。所以,下一次经济衰退、税收下降而支出必须上升的时候,会发生什么?我们会印出天量的美元。在1970年代,我们也遇到过这个问题。我们当时的做法就是通过通胀、通过增长来让货币贬值,结果货币损失了70%的购买力。而在那种环境下,大宗商品、硬资产和基础设施能保护你的购买力。去查一查。在1970年代,表现最好的资产类别是什么?遥遥领先的那个。
便签引用
13:19
That's your homework. So, with that, uh thank you and uh look forward to chatting with you guys. Shabbat, I think on the prediction show, you um did was your call I forget which category it was, but you definitely had top >> the best performing asset was going to be copper, yeah. >> Yeah. Pretty >> And that's before I talked to Dan. >> That's right. >> Which is saying something. >> Well, you know, I I think the copper price is easily going to double from here. I mean, I've seen I've seen molybdenum go from a dollar a pound to $33 a pound. So, a double is no big deal.
这是留给你们的作业。那么,嗯,谢谢大家,期待和各位聊聊。Shabbat,我记得在那个预测节目上,你嗯做的是你的预测,我忘了是哪个类别了,但你肯定把表现最好的资产排在了第一——表现最好的资产会是铜,对。>> 是的。挺 >> 而且那还是在我和Dan聊之前。>> 没错。>> 这就很说明问题了。>> 嗯,你知道,我觉得铜价从现在起翻倍是轻而易举的。我是说,我见过钼从一美元一磅涨到33美元一磅。所以翻一倍根本不算什么。
便签引用
08电网老化与电价从何而来
13:50
>> Yeah. >> And so >> Take a Take a step back. You said something really interesting backstage, which is If you look at everything that we're doing right now, we're barely going to keep up with just the natural energy demands of of humanity, right? Just explain that thesis the way that you framed it in the back. >> So, here's the issue. We have not invested in upgrading and modernizing and hardening the electric grid since post-World War II. We just let it go. You know, the last two, three, four administrations were sleepwalking and haven't done anything to harden this infrastructure. Now, if we simply just want to achieve our objectives to re-industrialize, reshore, electrify. When I say electrify, that just means replacing your old gas boilers in these buildings with heat pumps, which every commercial building is doing. It means, you know, electric car penetration going up. It means using your your your electronic devices more. Not even talking about AI.
>> 是啊。>> 所以 >> 往回退一步说。你在后台说了一件特别有意思的事,就是如果你看看我们现在正在做的一切,我们连人类自然的能源需求都勉强跟不上,对吧?就按你在后台那个说法,解释一下这个论点。回来。>> 那么,问题在这儿。我们从来没有投资去升级、现代化和加固电网,自从二战后。我们就这么放任不管了。你知道,过去两三届、四届政府都在梦游,根本没做任何事来加固这套基础设施。现在,如果我们只是想实现自己的目标——再工业化、制造业回流、电气化。我说电气化,意思就是把这些楼里老旧的燃气锅炉换成热泵,现在每栋商业楼宇都在这么干。意思是电动车渗透率在上升。意思是你的电子设备用得更多了。这还没算上 AI。
便签引用
14:54
Not even talking about AI. We're going to have shortfalls just from that. >> Just from living our lives. >> Just from living our lives. >> So, what happens? Blackouts, brownouts? >> Blackouts, brownouts, and we're going to have to >> prices. >> Rising electricity prices, but you know, you brought up a really great point I thought on one of your shows where you were talking about how the utilities are just really goosing up the cost to do everything so that they can report to their regulator and earn that ROE on the higher capital base. What's really interesting I think is really under-appreciated is that's where all the inflation is coming from. It's from the transmission and distribution from the utility because power prices over the last 20 years, even after the rise we've just had, power prices are still down they're definitely down in real terms, but they haven't really gone up much in absolute terms. And so, when you're talking about power going up >> making it is still cheap.
还没算上 AI 呢。光是这些就会造成电力缺口。>> 光是我们过日子就够了。>> 光是过日子就够了。>> 那会发生什么?大停电、限电?>> 大停电、限电,而且我们还得面对 >> 价格。>> 电价上涨。不过你在自己某期节目里提过一个我觉得特别好的点,你讲到公用事业公司是怎么把各项成本往上抬的,这样他们就能向监管机构报账,在更高的资本基数上赚取那个 ROE(股本回报率)。我觉得真正有意思、也真正被低估的一点是,通胀就是从这儿来的。是来自公用事业公司的输电和配电环节,因为过去 20 年的电价,哪怕算上刚刚这波上涨,电价实际上还是下降的——按实际购买力算肯定是降的,但按绝对值算也没涨多少。所以当你说电力涨价时 >> 发电本身还是便宜的。
便签引用
15:51
>> But getting more expensive. >> No, it's getting it but getting it to people is what >> getting it to people because, you know, the labor the labor by far and away is the biggest bottle that craft labor, right? What do we tell all our kids to do? You know, in in the last 10 or 15 years they go out and stand for you become a coder. >> northeast. >> Yeah. >> Right. Big mistake. And so, I'm curious from the audience, in your homes, how many people have put up solar and or power walls? How many people have actually done that? So, that's about half the crowd. How many people, second question, are planning to do that in the next year or two?
>> 但正变得越来越贵。>> 不是发电,是把电送到人手里这一环 >> 把电送到人手里,因为你知道,人工——人工是最大的瓶颈,就是那种技术工种,对吧?我们都让自己的孩子去干什么了?你知道,过去 10 年、15 年,他们都跑去当程序员了。>> 东北部。>> 是啊。>> 对。大错特错。所以我挺好奇现场观众的情况:你们家里有多少人装了太阳能或者Powerwall 储能?有多少人真的装了?大概一半的人。第二个问题,有多少人打算在未来一两年装?
便签引用
16:26
Okay, so that's another 20%. So, it's pretty obvious this is obviously a fluent crowd. They are routing around the grid. Is the solution to this energy independence in the >> Great question. >> you know, the home, in the business Businesses are not waiting for the government. So, maybe the grid is going to be like this weird archaic infrastructure and it's just going to be a ground-up solution. >> Well, you're going to need the grid no matter what for industrial use. I mean, that's that that's the foundation of industrial use. I mean, the scale of what we have to do just for industrial Here's a good stat for you.
好,那又多了 20%。所以很明显,这显然是一群有钱人。他们在绕开电网。解决方案是不是就在于能源独立 >> 好问题。>> 你知道,在家里、在企业里——企业可不会等政府。所以也许电网会变成一种奇怪的老古董基础设施,最后靠的是自下而上的解决方案。>> 不过,工业用电无论如何还是得靠电网。我是说,那是工业用电的根基。我是说,我们光是为工业要做的事情,规模就非常大。给你个很好的数据。
便签引用
17:02
So, a 1 gigawatt AI factory, if you wanted to do all solar, right? And I'm a big solar bull, okay? If you want to do all solar because solar's capacity factor is 20% cuz the sun doesn't shine all the time, with a capacity factor of 20%, a 1 gigawatt data center needs 5 GW of solar. Each GW of solar takes up 7,000 acres. So, at 5 GW that's 35,000 acres. That's bigger than San Francisco. So, where are you going to find the people? You know, where are you going to find That's that's the biggest bottleneck we have, by the way, is craft labor.
一座 1 吉瓦的 AI 工厂,如果你想全靠太阳能,对吧?而且我是坚定的太阳能多头,好吧?如果你想全用太阳能——因为太阳能的容量系数是 20%,太阳又不是一直照着——按 20% 的容量系数算,一座 1 吉瓦的数据中心需要 5 吉瓦的太阳能。每 1 吉瓦太阳能要占 7000 英亩地。那 5 吉瓦就是 3.5 万英亩,比旧金山还大。那你上哪儿找那么多人?你知道,上哪儿去找……这才是我们最大的瓶颈,顺便说一句,就是技术工人。
便签引用
09采矿创新与稀土加工瓶颈
17:33
>> Yeah. What about generally scarcity breeds innovation? There's been a conversation or I've seen some startups that are talking about new technology in mining to access I think traditionally rare earth uh is kind of the pitch. But, everything we need is in the earth below us. It's just that we only mine the stuff that's on the surface is the the the general thesis. Is there a set of innovations that you think are coming to market that are going to ultimately unleash more productivity than we see as cuz we're still using the same technology we did 100 years ago to get this stuff out of the ground?
>> 是啊。那从大方向看,稀缺会催生创新吗?有一种说法,我也看到一些初创公司在讲采矿的新技术,用来获取——我想传统上是稀土吧,大概是这么个卖点。但我们需要的一切都在我们脚下的地里,只是我们只开采地表的东西,这是大致的论点。你觉得有没有一批创新即将落地,最终能释放出比我们现在看到的更高的生产力?因为我们到现在还在用 100 年前那套技术把这些东西从地里挖出来。
便签引用
18:07
>> For some commodities, yes. You you brought up rare earths. So, so coming out of the 14th century, there were these guys called alchemists. Remember then they said they could turn lead into gold. And back then the periodic table was just four elements. There was water, there was fire, there was air, and there was earth. Now, fire you could figure out what it was. The air was pretty pure. The water was pure. But, every time they saw something in the earth they didn't know what it was, they called it a rare earth.
>> 对某些大宗商品来说,是的。你提到了稀土。所以,14 世纪以后出现了一帮人叫炼金术士。记得吧,他们说自己能把铅变成金子。那时候元素周期表就只有四种元素:水、火、气、土。那时候,火你还能弄明白是什么。气挺纯粹,水也挺纯粹。但每次他们在土里看到点什么弄不明白的东西,就管它叫稀土。
便签引用
18:36
And so, rare earths are everywhere. And the technology to extract rare earths is going to allow us to have a huge abundance of them. But, the problem is processing them. That's the problem. The Chinese have all the technological know-how to convert what you take out of the ground and convert it into something that we can use. And so, there's always going to be, you know, some element of conversion that you're going to need. With something like copper, the market is so big that it's really difficult to find a technology that could solve that problem overnight.
所以稀土其实到处都是。而提取稀土的技术将会让我们拥有极其充裕的稀土。但问题在于加工。这才是问题所在。中国人掌握了全部的技术诀窍,能把从地里挖出来的东西转化成我们能用的材料。所以,中间总会有那么一道你必须要做的转化工序。而像铜这种东西,市场太大了,很难找到一项技术能一夜之间解决那个问题。
便签引用
10技术工人与就业格局逆转
19:10
>> And if we are having, just to throw a couple of topics we've been talking about on the pod incessantly about if we do have uh this rivalry with China and they are the provider and that's the brittle part of the supply chain we can solve the problem of job displacement, not apocalypse, displacement. People in America who want jobs, these are going to be incredibly high-paying jobs and we can start bringing the fabs from Taiwan here, which we're doing. And we're going to bring both to North America and I understand South America from a friend of mine who's got an automated um mining uh system uh Adams, Travis. He We're going to be able to just create a large number of jobs here.
>> 那如果我们——随便提几个我们在播客里翻来覆去聊的话题——如果我们真的跟中国形成这种竞争关系,而他们是供应方、是供应链里最脆弱的那一环,我们能不能解决就业被替代的问题——不是末日,是岗位转移。在美国想找工作的人,这些都会是收入极高的工作,我们还能把台湾的晶圆厂搬过来,而这事我们正在做。我们会把它们带到北美,而且据我一位朋友说,南美也会有——他做的是自动化采矿系统,叫 Adams,那人是 Travis。我们将能够在这里创造出大量就业岗位。
便签引用
19:56
So, maybe you could talk a little bit about what impact We keep talking about how behind America is, but what happens to China if we stop buying? And we start building. >> What you said is is is very important for this whole jobs debate. The craft labor that we're going to need is going to be almost limitless for what we have to build. And there's really no other way around it, right? The The you know, in many ways, like look what happened in the 2000s, right? We tore down all our factories and moved them to China. And who got killed by that? It was the blue-collar craft labor, created all kinds of unintended consequences, fentanyl, uh you know, wealth gaps.
所以,也许你可以稍微讲讲这会有什么影响。我们老是在说美国落后了多少,但如果我们不买了,中国会怎么样?而我们开始自己造。>> 你说的这点对整个就业辩论非常重要。我们要建这么多东西,所需要的技术工人几乎是无上限的。而且真的没有别的办法绕过去,对吧?你知道,在很多方面,就看看 2000 年代发生了什么,对吧?我们把自己的工厂全拆了搬到中国去。那谁被搞垮了?是蓝领技术工人,这带来了各种意想不到的后果:芬太尼、还有贫富差距。
便签引用
20:47
>> Pennsylvania, Detroit. >> coast were making all the money and the heart of the country, the salt of the earth, was was getting killed. What's ironic today is that same part of the middle country, those people that got displaced, are now getting entry-level salaries. You know, if you go to Quanta University and you're top of your class, you're starting out at 150 grand right out of high school. And the jobs they're doing ironically are the jobs that may or may not be displacing some of the early, you know, lower level white-collar labor. And so so the tables the tables have totally turned. And so look, it's it's an it's an efficient market. The jobs are going to flow where the money is and the money right now is is really coming into this area.
>> 宾夕法尼亚、底特律。>> 沿海在赚所有的钱,而国家的心脏地带、那些最踏实本分的人,却被搞垮了。今天讽刺的是,中部地区同样这批人,当年被淘汰掉的那批人,现在拿到的入门级薪水——你知道,如果你去 Quanta University(匡塔大学)读,而且成绩名列前茅,高中一毕业起薪就是 15 万美元。而讽刺的是,他们做的这些工作,恰恰可能正在取代一部分早期的、较低层级的白领岗位。所以形势完全反过来了。所以你看,这是个有效市场。工作会流向有钱的地方,而现在钱正大量涌入这个领域。
便签引用
11能源组合取舍与白银库存
21:28
>> Can we talk about a couple of other areas? What's your take on uh other forms of energy? Not gas, coal, nuclear, hydrocarbons. I mean, the demand pull seem like if just based on this maybe the most reductive takeaway is everything. But then how do you Dan differentiate like why were you why did you say for example you're super bullish solar? What are your thoughts on nuclear? How do you trade all these off? These different sources of energy? >> So we're we're swimming in natural gas in this country. We can build solar. Uh you know, that's that's not a bottleneck. And nuclear, you know, we we can't really build it.
>> 我们能聊聊其他几个领域吗?你怎么看其他形式的能源?不说天然气、煤炭,核能、碳氢化合物呢。我是说,需求拉动看起来……如果基于这些做个最粗暴的总结,那就是所有能源都要。但那你怎么区分呢,Dan?比如你为什么说自己特别看好太阳能?你对核能怎么看?你怎么在这些之间权衡?这些不同的能源来源?>> 我们国家的天然气多到快淹了。太阳能我们能建,这个不是瓶颈。至于核能,我们其实建不起来。
便签引用
22:09
We can't even build the containment vessels in this country. The Koreans can do it, but we can't do that here. So there's always going to be these big bottlenecks in the system. And whether you're talking about solar, whether you're talking about nat gas, whether you're talking about uranium, we're going to have the raw inputs like the natural gas that we drill from the ground, but what we're going to be short of is the critical minerals to build the nuclear power plants. We're going to be short the silver, for example, to build these solar panels, especially if we start launching data centers in space.
我们连安全壳都造不出来。韩国人能造,但我们在这儿造不了。所以系统里总会有这些大的瓶颈。不管你说的是太阳能,还是天然气,还是铀,我们会有原始的投入品,比如我们从地下钻出来的天然气,但我们会短缺的是建核电站所需的关键矿产。比如我们会缺白银,用来做这些太阳能板,尤其是如果我们开始往太空发射数据中心的话。
便签引用
22:40
Right? These are going to consume incredible amounts of silver. Right now the silver supply demand dynamic is we consume a billion 2 oz a year, we supply a billion oz a year. So there's a 200 million ton deficit per year. And we only have 600 million of above ground inventory left. So the clock's ticking. We got 3 years left, guys, before we just stock out. And then the solar story is where do you get the silver for the photovoltaic cells? >> So for our kids and for the country, generation tool belt for us allocating, get some exposure to copper, silver, minerals, and then there's a bunch of service providers in and around that area that we should be investigating over the next year.
对吧?那会消耗掉惊人数量的白银。目前白银的供需格局是:我们一年消耗 12 亿盎司,供应 10 亿盎司。所以每年有 2 亿的缺口。而我们地面库存只剩 6 亿了。所以时钟在滴答走。各位,我们还有 3 年就要彻底断货了。那到时候太阳能的问题就是:你上哪儿去弄光伏电池用的白银?>> 所以对我们的孩子、对这个国家来说,是「工具腰带一代」;对我们做资产配置的人来说,就是配点铜、白银、矿产的敞口,另外这个领域周边还有一批服务商,我们接下来一年应该好好研究研究。
便签引用
12如何在供应链里配置资本
23:16
>> Don't forget the labor, the service providers. That's a big one. >> Okay. >> And how do you allocate capital? You're at the front end of owning what? Mines and production, but then also the end use cases. Like how do you decide where to not play? Cuz a lot of these things it looks like these are incredible end markets, but you can get run over. Like if you're in the wrong part of the market, there's supply shocks, there's supply shaping by China, there's price dumping. It can be all obvious and you could make you could lose a lot of money, too.
>> 别忘了劳动力、那些服务商。那可是个大头。>> 好的。>> 那你怎么配置资本?你处在最上游,拥有什么?矿山和生产,但同时也有终端应用场景。你怎么决定哪些不碰?因为这里面很多东西看起来都是特别棒的终端市场,但你也可能被碾过去。比如你要是站错了市场的位置,会有供给冲击,会有中国主导的供给调控,会有低价倾销。一切可能都看起来很明显,但你也可能亏掉很多钱。
便签引用
23:44
>> Yeah, look, you really have to understand supply chains, and I think I think to a lot of people out there the supply chains are this sort of weird, mystical concept. And I still think a lot of urban Americans still think a ham sandwich comes from the refrigerator, and they don't think about the 30 million pigs every month they're getting slaughtered slaughtered outside of Chicago with >> Freeburg started. He's >> But, you know, you got to understand where the pinch points are in the supply chain, number one. And number two, I think you have to really make sure that you're not going to get technologically disrupted, where you can find You know, I think this is to Freeburg's point, where you can find something that's going to replace that tightness in the supply chain.
>> 是啊,你看,你真的得搞懂供应链。我觉得对很多人来说,供应链就是个有点玄乎、神秘的概念。我到现在还觉得很多美国城里人以为一个火腿三明治是从冰箱里长出来的,他们不会去想每个月有 3000 万头猪在芝加哥郊外被宰掉 >> Freeburg 起的头。他 >> 但你知道,你得搞明白供应链里的卡点在哪儿,这是第一。第二,我觉得你得真正确保自己不会被技术颠覆,就是那种你能找到……你知道,我觉得这就是 Freeburg 说的那个点,就是你能找到某种东西,去替代供应链里的那个紧张环节。
便签引用
24:19
>> up for Dan. Well done. Very very informative. [applause] >> [music] >> Thanks, bro.
>> 给 Dan 的。说得真好,非常有启发。[掌声] >> [音乐] >> 谢了,兄弟。
便签引用
视频总结 · 一句话概括与核心要点

一句话概括

Fornight Capital 的 Dan Dreyfus 认为,美国正从二十年"零资本"增长模式转向重工业化、电网重建与 AI 算力建设同时爆发的资本密集周期,而关键矿物(尤其是铜)将成为继 HBM 内存之后的下一个硬瓶颈,供给冲击叠加需求冲击与美元贬值,构成一轮刚开始几年的十五年级商品大周期。

核心要点

  • 过去二十年是"零资本"经济奇迹,代价是掏空了工业基础。 Google、Meta、SaaS、流媒体等公司几乎不投入实物资本就创造了数万亿市值(Meta 以少量资金和 12 名员工买下 WhatsApp),与此同时美国把关键基础设施拆掉迁往中国。COVID、俄乌冲突、关税、伊朗冲突每次爆发通胀都飙升且不回落,根源是供应链过于脆弱、毫无冗余。
  • 史无前例的多个资本周期正在同时叠加。 航空(波音+空客未来十年 1 万亿美元积压订单,还要和太空经济争抢同样的材料);电网(每十年约 1 万亿美元、持续 30 年);数据中心(每年 1 万亿美元);半导体厂(官方估计 7500 亿美元,他认为将以万亿计,CPU 需求正在猛增);以及美日欧同步扩张的国防预算。所有这些终端市场的共同点是:没有关键矿物一样都建不成。
  • 中国的出口管制已让福特离全线停产只有几天。 去年 4 月中国宣布对美断供钐、钆、铽、镝、镥、钪、钇、铒和银等材料,钐钴磁体断供导致福特汽车和麦道公司均濒临整条生产线停摆。这引发了战争部与能源部的紧急行动。
  • 美国政府用"三张纸"模式复活被遗弃二十年的小矿企。 第一张是政府直接入股的股权投资,第二张是等了二十年终于批下的采矿许可,第三张是带最低保底价的照付不议承购协议,保底价锁定高内部收益率并保留全部上行空间,让企业能立即融资快速推进。他做了 25 年商品,从未见过这种力度,但也坦言追上中国至少需要 10 到 20 年。
  • 铜是"金属之王",AI 数据中心单项需求就超过全球年度供给增量。 太阳能每兆瓦耗铜是燃气联合循环机组的 5 倍,风电 7 倍;1 吉瓦 AI 工厂需 5 万吨铜,年建设 15 吉瓦即需 75 万吨,而去年全球铜供给仅增长 50 万吨。电动车耗铜是燃油车的 5 到 6 倍;俄乌战争消耗的炸药超过整个二战,"铜头蛇"等炮弹全由铜制成且无法回收。
  • 未来 18 年要用掉人类一万年的铜总量,但新矿远远不够。 有史以来人类共开采约 7 亿吨铜;当前年需求 3000 万吨(400 万吨来自回收,2600 万吨来自开采),即便仅按 GDP 增速、不计数据中心和绿电增量,未来 18 年也需要 7 亿吨。这意味着每年要有 5 座世界级一级大矿投产,而到本十年末实际投产的一级矿"一只手数得过来还有余"。建一座铜矿需 7 到 12 年,智利大矿已超百年、品位持续衰减。
  • 电网本身即使不算 AI 也已濒临崩溃,通胀来自输配而非发电。 美国自二战后基本没有升级加固过电网,德州 ERCOT 孤网一遇寒潮就停摆,加州帕拉代斯致 300 人死亡的火灾起因线路已有 106 年历史。仅热泵替换燃气锅炉、电动车渗透、设备用电增长这些"正常生活"就足以造成短缺。发电成本 20 年来实际未涨,涨价来自公用事业公司为向监管机构报更高资本基础以赚取 ROE 而抬高的输配成本;最大瓶颈是技工劳动力。
  • 太阳能可建但占地惊人,核电连容器都造不了。 1 吉瓦数据中心若全用太阳能,因容量因子仅 20% 需 5 吉瓦装机,每吉瓦占地 7000 英亩,合计 3.5 万英亩,比旧金山还大。美国天然气充裕、太阳能能建,但核电安全壳容器只有韩国能造;真正短缺的是建核电站的关键矿物和造光伏板的银。
  • 银在约三年内可能彻底"断货"。 年消费 12 亿盎司、年供给 10 亿盎司,年缺口 2 亿盎司,地上库存仅剩 6 亿盎司;若太空数据中心启动将进一步吞噬银供给。
  • 美元贬值是第三重推力,硬资产是 1970 年代的答案。 联邦债务 40 万亿美元、年增 2.5 万亿;医保、社保、养老金等未来负债折现值 100 万亿、同样年增 2.5 万亿;而联邦年税收仅 5.5 万亿。下次衰退税收下降、支出上升时只能"狂印美元"。1970 年代美国就是靠通胀稀释债务,美元购买力损失 70%,那十年表现最好的资产类别是商品和硬资产。

结论与值得注意的细节

  • 投资结论:商品周期通常持续 15 年、上行幅度可达数倍,本轮才刚开始几年。他认为铜价"轻松翻倍"(他曾见钼从每磅 1 美元涨到 33 美元)。建议配置铜、银、关键矿物,以及周边服务商,并特别强调不要忘了劳动力和服务提供商这一环。
  • 风险提示:必须真正理解供应链的卡点,并确保所投资的环节不会被技术颠覆。稀土的储量其实到处都是,提取技术会带来丰裕,真正的壁垒在加工转化环节,而中国掌握全部工艺;铜市场则大到很难被某项技术一夜解决。
  • 就业角度:2000 年代去工业化摧毁了蓝领技工,带来芬太尼和贫富差距等后果;如今局面反转,Quanta 培训学校的顶尖毕业生高中毕业起薪即达 15 万美元,而被 AI 冲击的反而是初级白领岗位。
  • 对分布式能源的看法:现场约半数听众已安装家用光伏或储能,另有两成计划安装,富裕人群正在"绕开电网",但工业用电无论如何离不开电网,这是工业的根基。
  • 历史小趣闻:他解释"稀土"一词源自中世纪炼金术士,当时周期表只有水、火、气、土四种元素,凡是地里认不出的东西都叫"稀土",因此稀土其实并不稀有。
  • 主持人补充:主持人之一在此前的年度预测节目中就已选定铜为年度最佳资产,而那时还未与 Dan 交流。
核心句型 · 10
1. Do you know what X was? + 出人意料的数字
“Do you know what the copper supply was last year? It grew only 500,000 tons”
先用反问吊起注意,再抛出对比数字。适合演讲中呈现关键数据:把数字放在问句之后单独成句,冲击力更强。
2. Forgetting about X, forgetting about Y, just …
“Forgetting about data center upside, forgetting about green energy solar upside, just growing at GDP like we used to”
排比式剥离:先排除所有乐观因素,只保留最保守假设,再得出结论。用于论证「即使最保守估计也……」。
3. You can count on one hand and have some fingers left over
“You can count on one hand and have some fingers left over the number of tier one mines that are coming on”
「一只手数得过来还有余」的强调式说法,比 very few 更生动。仿写时后接 the number of + 名词。
4. A supply shock meets a demand shock.
“A supply shock meets a demand shock.”
X meets Y 的极简句式,用两个名词短语并置概括局面。适合作段落结论句或标题,简短有力。
5. To their credit, …
“And to their credit, they're doing something really aggressive and really important.”
在批评语境中转而肯定对方,表示「公平地说,这一点值得肯定」。用于平衡评价,显得客观。
6. It's going to take at least X, probably Y, but we got to start somewhere
“It's going to take at least 10 years, probably 20 to catch up, but we got to start somewhere”
承认困难再表明行动立场的结构。at least … probably … 表示区间估计,start somewhere 是常用口语表达「总得开始」。
7. Not even talking about X.
“Not even talking about AI. We're going to have shortfalls just from that.”
省略主语的片段句,强调「这还没算上 X」。口语与演讲中用来层层加码,暗示真实情况更严重。
8. What's ironic today is that …
“What's ironic today is that same part of the middle country, those people that got displaced, are now getting entry-level salaries”
用 what 引导的名词性从句做主语,引出反转事实。适合陈述「讽刺的是……」这类今昔对比。
9. where you can keep all the upside above X, but here's Y
“Where you can keep all the upside above the minimum price, but here's a minimum price that you can go out and raise a bunch of capital”
解释合同或激励机制时的结构:先说好处(上行全归你),再补条件或保障。可用于描述任何风险共担安排。
10. if you want to look around the corner and see X coming, I strongly urge you to look at Y
“If you want to look around the corner and see the next bottleneck coming, I strongly urge you to look at copper”
look around the corner 是「预见未来」的形象说法;I strongly urge you to 是正式而有力的建议句式,适合总结性推荐。
词汇精讲 · 113 · 按出现顺序
critical minerals phr. 0:00
关键矿产;对经济与国防至关重要且供应易受扰动的矿物
fragile /ˈfrædʒəl/ adj. 0:00
脆弱的,易损的
reshoring /ˌriˈʃɔrɪŋ/ n. 0:00
制造业回流(与 offshoring 外迁相对)
reindustrialization /ˌriɪnˌdʌstriələˈzeɪʃən/ n. 0:00
再工业化
inflection point phr. 0:55
拐点,转折点
market cap phr. 0:55
市值(market capitalization 的缩写)
capital light phr. 0:55
轻资产的;无需大量固定资本投入的
tearing down phr. v. 1:47
拆除,拆毁
doubling down phr. v. 1:47
加倍下注;在原有立场上进一步押注
come back to bite us idiom 1:47
反噬;自食其果
flare-ups /ˈflɛr ʌps/ n. 1:47
(冲突、疾病的)突然爆发,骤起
resiliency /rɪˈzɪliənsi/ n. 1:47
韧性,抗冲击恢复能力
infrastructure-intensive adj. 2:52
高度依赖基础设施的
demand shock phr. 2:52
需求冲击(经济学术语,需求突然大幅变动)
backlog /ˈbækˌlɔɡ/ n. 3:30
积压订单;待处理事项
source /sɔrs/ v. 3:30
采购,寻找货源
tsunami of demand phr. 4:07
海啸般的需求(比喻用法)
resurgence /rɪˈsɜrdʒəns/ n. 4:56
复苏,复兴
semi fabs phr. 4:56
半导体晶圆厂(semiconductor fabrication plants)
end markets phr. 4:56
终端市场,下游应用市场
porky pie /ˈpɔrki paɪ/ n. 4:56
(伦敦押韵俚语)谎言;此处讲者似指「棘手问题」
cut off phr. v. 5:37
切断(供应)
to their credit phr. 6:17
值得肯定的是;公平地说
left for dead idiom 6:17
被弃置不顾;被认为没救了
equity check phr. 6:17
股权投资款(以支票形式注入的股权资金)
permit /ˈpɜrmɪt/ n. 6:58
许可证(此处指采矿许可)
off-take agreement phr. 6:58
包销协议;买方承诺购买未来产量的合同
take or pay phr. 6:58
照付不议;不提货也须付款的合同条款
floor price phr. 6:58
最低保底价
internal rate of return phr. 6:58
内部收益率(IRR)
upside /ˈʌpˌsaɪd/ n. 6:58
上涨空间,潜在收益
fast-tracked /ˈfæst trækt/ adj. 6:58
被快速推进的,走快速通道的
up and running phr. 6:58
投入运行,正常运转
grip /ɡrɪp/ n. 6:58
控制,掌控(have a grip on)
déjà vu /ˌdeɪʒɑ ˈvu/ n. 7:41
似曾相识感(讲者此处反其意而用)
base load phr. 8:17
基荷;电网需持续满足的最低负荷
gas-fired turbine phr. 8:17
燃气轮机
internal combustion engine phr. 8:54
内燃机
artillery shells /ɑrˈtɪləri ʃɛlz/ n. 8:54
炮弹
rip up phr. v. 9:48
扯掉,拆毁
in line with phr. 10:28
与……一致,按……的比例
coming online phr. 10:28
(矿山、电厂)投产,上线
depleting /dɪˈplitɪŋ/ v. 10:28
耗竭,逐渐减少
grades /ɡreɪdz/ n. 10:28
(矿石)品位,含矿量
tier one phr. 10:28
一级的,顶级的(此处指大型低成本长寿命矿山)
all the rage idiom 11:24
风靡一时,人人追捧
going vertical phr. 11:24
(价格)直线上涨
look around the corner idiom 11:24
预见即将到来的事;看到拐角后的东西
bottleneck /ˈbɑtəlˌnɛk/ n. 11:24
瓶颈
fiat currencies /ˈfiɑt ˈkɜrənsiz/ n. 12:04
法定货币(无贵金属背书,靠政府信用)
discounted present value phr. 12:04
折现后的现值
liabilities /ˌlaɪəˈbɪlətiz/ n. 12:04
负债,债务义务
tax receipts phr. 12:42
税收收入
debased /dɪˈbeɪst/ v. 12:42
使(货币)贬值;降低成色
purchasing power phr. 12:42
购买力
hard assets phr. 12:42
硬资产(实物资产,如矿产、房地产)
by a mile idiom 12:42
遥遥领先,差距悬殊
no big deal phr. 13:19
没什么大不了
hardening /ˈhɑrdənɪŋ/ n. 13:50
(基础设施)加固,提升抗灾抗攻击能力
sleepwalking /ˈslipˌwɔkɪŋ/ v. 13:50
梦游;比喻浑浑噩噩、无所作为
heat pumps n. 13:50
热泵(替代燃气锅炉的电气化供暖设备)
penetration /ˌpɛnəˈtreɪʃən/ n. 13:50
渗透率,普及率
shortfalls /ˈʃɔrtˌfɔlz/ n. 14:54
缺口,不足
brownouts /ˈbraʊnˌaʊts/ n. 14:54
限电,电压下降(区别于 blackout 全面停电)
goosing up phr. v. 14:54
(口语)人为抬高,刺激上升
utilities /juˈtɪlətiz/ n. 14:54
公用事业公司(电力、燃气、水务)
under-appreciated /ˌʌndər əˈpriʃiˌeɪtɪd/ adj. 14:54
被低估的,未得到充分认识的
transmission and distribution phr. 14:54
输电与配电
in real terms phr. 14:54
按实际值(扣除通胀后)计算
by far and away phr. 15:51
远远地,无可争议地
craft labor phr. 15:51
技术工种劳动力(电工、焊工、线路工等)
routing around phr. v. 16:26
绕开,绕过(原为网络术语)
archaic /ɑrˈkeɪɪk/ adj. 16:26
过时的,古旧的
ground-up /ˈɡraʊnd ʌp/ adj. 16:26
自下而上的,从零开始的
solar bull phr. 17:02
看好太阳能的人(bull 指多头)
capacity factor phr. 17:02
容量系数;实际发电量与理论满发量之比
acres /ˈeɪkərz/ n. 17:02
英亩(1 英亩约 4047 平方米)
scarcity breeds innovation phr. 17:33
稀缺催生创新
unleash /ʌnˈliʃ/ v. 17:33
释放,解放(潜力、力量)
alchemists /ˈælkəmɪsts/ n. 18:07
炼金术士
abundance /əˈbʌndəns/ n. 18:36
充裕,丰富
know-how /ˈnoʊ haʊ/ n. 18:36
技术诀窍,实操知识
overnight /ˌoʊvərˈnaɪt/ adv. 18:36
一夜之间,突然
incessantly /ɪnˈsɛsəntli/ adv. 19:10
不停地,没完没了地
rivalry /ˈraɪvəlri/ n. 19:10
竞争,对抗关系
brittle /ˈbrɪtəl/ adj. 19:10
脆的,易断裂的(比喻供应链脆弱)
displacement /dɪsˈpleɪsmənt/ n. 19:10
(岗位)被替代,迁移
blue-collar /ˌblu ˈkɑlər/ adj. 19:56
蓝领的,体力劳动的
unintended consequences phr. 19:56
意想不到的后果
salt of the earth idiom 20:47
社会中坚,最踏实本分的人
the tables have totally turned idiom 20:47
形势完全逆转,攻守易位
efficient market phr. 20:47
有效市场(价格与资源迅速反映信息)
entry-level /ˈɛntri ˌlɛvəl/ adj. 20:47
入门级的,初级的
reductive /rɪˈdʌktɪv/ adj. 21:28
过度简化的,粗暴归纳的
hydrocarbons /ˌhaɪdroʊˈkɑrbənz/ n. 21:28
碳氢化合物;泛指油气化石燃料
trade all these off phr. v. 21:28
在这些之间权衡取舍(trade off)
swimming in idiom 21:28
多得泛滥,拥有大量
bullish /ˈbʊlɪʃ/ adj. 21:28
看涨的,看好的
containment vessels phr. 22:09
(核反应堆)安全壳
raw inputs phr. 22:09
原始投入品,原材料
stock out phr. v. 22:40
断货,库存耗尽
above ground inventory phr. 22:40
地面库存(已开采、可交易的存量)
photovoltaic cells /ˌfoʊtoʊvɑlˈteɪɪk sɛlz/ n. 22:40
光伏电池
exposure /ɪkˈspoʊʒər/ n. 22:40
(投资)敞口,风险暴露
tool belt n. 22:40
工具腰带;「工具腰带一代」指转向技工行业的年轻人
get run over phr. 23:16
被碾压,被市场击垮
price dumping phr. 23:16
低价倾销
allocate capital phr. 23:16
配置资本
mystical /ˈmɪstɪkəl/ adj. 23:44
神秘的,玄乎的
slaughtered /ˈslɔtərd/ v. 23:44
屠宰
pinch points phr. 23:44
卡点,最易受挤压的薄弱环节
technologically disrupted phr. 23:44
被技术颠覆
tightness /ˈtaɪtnəs/ n. 23:44
(市场)供给紧张
精读便签
下载便签 手机:长按图片也可保存
← 上一期 · NO.203Jared Isaacman: A New Era for NASA and American Space Exploration 下一期 · NO.205 →Rahm Emanuel: Trump's Foreign Policy, China, Europe's Decline, Immigration & DSA vs Democrats
苏菲周报 · THE WEEKLY 每周一封,
追问一个大问题。
苏菲拉底的每周来信,写这一周在追问的问题和看到的回应。
苏菲拉底
ASK THE BIG QUESTIONS · THINK DEEPLY · SEE THE WORLD DIFFERENTLY
苏菲拉底微信公众号二维码 微信公众号
© 2026 苏菲拉底 · 内容仅供学习 [email protected]